An agent in San Diego Sector was surprised when he went to fasten his seatbelt in a Ford Crown VIctoria and the seatbelt was no longer secured to the vehicle. Upon closer inspection, the bolt that secured the retractable section of the seatbelt was lying on the floor of the vehicle. In addition, the bolt securing the retractable section of the passenger’s seatbelt was also loose and ready to fall off.
Upon further review, the union learned that the original design and integrity of the seatbelts were compromised when the cage was installed in the vehicle by Federal Prison Industries, Inc. (FPI) . In order to install the cage, the retractable sections of the driver’s and passenger’s seatbelts were removed. After the cage was installed, the retractable seatbelts were installed again using the same bolts, but this time they were installed over an added section of sheet metal, which is approximately ¼ of an inch thick.
As a result, NBPC Local 1613 expressed concerns about this issue during the San Diego Sector, union/management Health and Safety Committee. In addition, the National Border Patrol Council (NBPC) informed the Office of Border Patrol about the issue. In order to properly address this dangerous issue, the NBPC believes the Border Patrol should:
1.    Immediately notify all employees of this dangerous situation and ground all Crown Victorias until such time that a complete and thorough inspection of the seatbelts is conducted;

2.    Investigate the original order for the modifications to determine who authorized compromising the design and integrity of the seatbelts;
3.    Require FPI to prove the modification was authorized by Ford or present substantial evidence to prove the modification does not jeopardize the original design and integrity of the seatbelts;
4.    If proven that the modification was authorized by Ford or is safe, FPI shall be responsible for immediately taking whatever corrective action is necessary to prevent the bolts from loosening in the future and to maintain the integrity of the seatbelts; and
5.    Notify all employees of the corrective actions taken to resolve this critical situation.
Until notified otherwise, agents should conduct an inspection of the retractable seatbelts every time a Crown Vic is the assigned vehicle and until the Border Patrol notifies every employee of the measures that were taken by FPI to resolve this critical situation and ensure the integrity of the seatbelts.
NOTE: The union was informed that the modifications were performed by FPI and does not know if Ford approved the modifications or is aware of the modifications. Additionally, it is not known how many other agencies use FPI for similar modifications to Crown Vics.

San Diego, California - The U.S. Border Patrol continues their attempt to militarize the Border Patrol and display contempt for the rank and file by providing agents with substandard sleeping arrangements while they attend training in the San Diego Sector. Below is a picture of the sleeping arrangements in an airport hangar that the Border Patrol provided for the agents who traveled to San Diego.

In an attempt to further support the failing National Border Patrol Strategy, the Border Patrol decided to waste millions of dollars to construct permanent Forward Operating Bases (FOB) in the Tucson, Yuma, and El Paso sectors. The National Border Patrol Council (NBPC) believes FOBs are an enormous waste of taxpayer money for numerous reasons, some of which are documented later in this article. If FOBs are going to be constructed without regard to their effectiveness, then the NBPC believes the Border Patrol should be required to construct the FOBs in accordance with regulations designed for permanent government housing and Border Patrol stations, not regulations designed for temporary migrant worker camps. Finally, the Border Patrol should be forced to cease operations at all FOBs until the Border Patrol properly addresses the serious safety and security issues that currently exist at the FOBs or the Border Patrol will not be able to falsely claim they were unaware of the unsafe conditions that exist if and when one of our agents are injured or killed while assigned to the FOBs.


In response to some unscrupulous managers who are trying to provoke bargaining unit employees by making misleading statements about the grievance that was filed regarding the base-layer clothing, the following clarification is provided by the Union:

Initially, the Union emphasizes that it supports optional base-layer clothing, and has supported the concept of optional crew neck undershirts for years. The Union did not ask management to cease and desist from offering base-layer clothing, but had to file the grievance to force the Agency to fulfill its statutory obligation to bargain with the Union so that the legitimate concerns outlined herein can be addressed. Chief Aguilar's failure to follow the law and the contract in this instance is not just a technical violation; it goes to the heart of a labor-management relationship based on mutual trust and respect. The Agency consistently ignores its legal obligations in an attempt to marginalize the Union and cause dissent and division. The Union does not believe that it is unreasonable to expect the head of a law enforcement agency to follow the law. We all know what happens to an agent who violates a Federal statute or policy. Why should managers be held to a lower standard? If Chief Aguilar would lead by example, Sector Chiefs would follow.


Chief Aguilar claims that uniformity is the reason the base-layer clothing items are green, however, he cannot explain how this is achieved when one agent is wearing a green crew neck t-shirt and another agent is wearing a black turtle-neck. Similarly, he cannot explain how this goal is accomplished when the various green uniform items fade and agents are wearing several shades of green. Although color is not the primary issue for the Union, it is concerned that the exact shade required by the Agency may not be available outside of the uniform vendor. Additionally, one really has to wonder about the importance of uniformity in the color of underpants. While most supervisors are reasonable, we all know that there are some supervisors who have nothing better to do than make an issue out of the color of the base-layer clothing items. The Union wants to avoid these potential problems now and make sure that the issue is properly addressed for the future.


Does anyone understand why management would require base-layer clothing items to be made of only one material? The Union recognizes that a moisture wicking material is important to those who work in hotter climates, but cotton and/or cotton blends should be options for those who work in moderate climates or who just prefer such materials.


As we all know, the authorized uniform vendor (currently VF Solutions) typically charges far more than a local or online retailer because it has a monopoly. This has been an ongoing concern for the Union.The cost of the base-layer clothing is a prime example of this problem. The least expensive base-layer clothing item, the short sleeve level 1 base-layer crew neck t-shirt, costs $24.64, or $147.84 for a set of six. A popular online retailer sells olive drab green crew-neck t-shirts for only $4.00 apiece, or $24.00 for a half-dozen.

The Union does not want to delay the implementation of the new base-layer clothing uniform items over these issues, and has offered to allow the initiative to move forward if the Agency authorizes employees to wear olive drab green crew-neck t-shirts of any material acquired from any source and offers a couple of lower-cost alternatives through the uniform vendor. The Union is still awaiting management's response.


OT Lawsuit

If you are a border patrol agent who is a member of the NBPC union, click here for info to sign up for the overtime lawsuit.



Member News

  • Ammo Inc. Benefit for NBPC Members +

    The NBPC has partnered with Ammo Inc. to provide members with the opportunity to purchase ammunition at a discounted rate. Read More
  • PBR Shows Why the Sport Always Stands for the American Flag +

    The National Border Patrol Council thanks the Professional Bull Riders (PBR) for this video, which honors those who made the ultimate Read More
  • Border Patrol Agent and his family displaced after fire destroys home +

    On November 6, 2017, Malta station BPA Michael Morser, his wife, and two daughters lost their home to a devastating Read More
  • 1

Find your local

Know Your Rights

  • Obey Now, Grieve Later +

    "Obey now, grieve later" - an employee should obey a supervisors lawful order and grieve the order later if the employee Read More
  • Hearing Loss Guidance +

    When an injured federal employee files a workers’ compensation claim for hearing loss, it is common to find challenges when Read More
  • DOL Publications +

    If you have any questions about the applicability of the Federal Employee Compensation Act (FECA) and its application in OWCP Read More
  • 1